A Bit Little Growth in Bag Sales of USA

Bags 2015 US sales growth of 5%, in fact, the whole is very good, next time, we will follow the world's clothing and shoes network Xiaobian take a look at the detailed information it.
    According to the US market research firm Nielsen (NPDGroup) study shows that in 2015 the United States Bags sales growth of 5%, of its total sales of $ 11.5 billion. 18-34 year-old woman who bought bags consumer spending grew by only 2%, and they are 34 years old lady because of age differences in spending habits quite different.
    In the Nielsen market research company and consumer groups together consumer tests show that 18-year-old -34 year-old woman is no longer impulse spending, they always research before you buy by comparing the network, 41 percent said they buy before the bag, will be the selection of products with a month's time.
    When selected, they pay more attention to the properties and functions of bags and do not pay attention to brand names of products, that is to say, they are more likely to buy brand new products, instead of those famous brand products.
    Related Links:
    For decades, economists have reached a consensus: an open international trade to the US economy. But recent studies have found that, although this view is still correct, but when it comes to China, the decline of the US working class than experts predicted even more painful. Which accentuates the presidential campaign.
    If you look under the North American Free Trade Agreement with Mexico's trade or, in fact, not many American workers suffer, but China is another matter. "China's rise in the world is a historic event," Otter said. "This is the largest country in the world, it caused a massive contraction of US manufacturing employment rate."
    From 2000 to 2007, China's trade with the US and from the loss of one million manufacturing jobs. Other unemployment due to technological advances and productivity gains resulting from not included included. Trade theory does not say that all workers should be protected, but said both countries would trade earnings. But why the trade between China and will bring pain?
    First look at the trade between the United States and France. France is good at making delicious cheese, the United States can produce good Chevrolet. If you let the exchange between the two countries, the outcome can only be unpalatable cheese and poor quality cars. So the business was born, the two countries need to do their own good things, but also has cheese and cars.
    But China and France's situation is different, China is a big country, it exports to the US products that US manufacturers can produce the original, but its price is lower. China will shift its one billion rural workers, creating a cheap labor manufacturing powerhouse. But even so, Ottl acknowledged that "we still benefit."
    You wear shoes, wear watches, kitchen appliances and mobile phones, these supplies are due to international trade become cheaper and better quality. Otter said that in addition to reducing jobs, the United States and China actually benefit. With respect to the criticism of trade agreements, Otter said he would prefer people to focus on how to help unemployed workers. Compared with other developed countries, the United States at this point it is far from enough.
    However, the current friction is that these benefits are broad and dispersed, but US blue-collar feel pain is very concentrated. "If I work for decades furniture factory unemployment, Wal-Mart cheaper toys and raincoat will not let me feel happy," Otter said that our country should discuss this issue.